• Hello,
  • Login
  • Logout
  • My Profile
socma full colsocmaSOLUTIONS FOR SPECIALTIES
  • About
    • About SOCMA
    • Board of Governors
      • Board Materials
    • Our Team
      • Careers at SOCMA
    • Affiliated Orgs
      • BIO-PROCESS SYSTEMS ALLIANCE
      • COLOR PIGMENTS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
      • Institute for Polyacrylate Absorbents
        • IPA SAP Webinar Series
  • Membership
    • SOCMA Membership
    • Membership List
      • Affiliates
    • Member Benefits
    • Committees and Peer Groups
    • Manage Account
  • Products and Services
    • ChemOps Training
    • Commercial Services
      • Lead Sheet
        • Active Lead Sheets
      • Member Services Directory
      • Outlook Report
      • Critical Chemicals
      • Strategic Partnership Program
      • SOCMA Pulse Poll Series Initiative
    • Operations / Manufacturing
      • ChemStewards
      • Safety Recognition Program
        • 2025 Recipients
      • Sustainability Resources
    • Policy
    • Center for Specialty Chemical Science
  • Resource Center
    • News and Blogs
    • Career Center
    • Member Services Directory
    • Specialty Chemistry
  • Events
    • SOCMA Show
    • Sustainability & Safety Workshop
    • Chemspec Europe
    • SOCMA Summit
    • Event Photo Gallery
  • Sponsorship
  • Policy & Supply Chain Tracker

    Home > Policy and Supply Chain Tracker

    SOCMA is actively tracking policy and regulatory shifts under the Trump administration that impact the specialty chemical industry. This hub serves as your one-stop resource for staying informed about trade policies, regulatory changes, supply chain disruptions, and advocacy efforts.

    Get timely insights on tariffs, environmental rules, permitting changes, and global trade to navigate the evolving landscape effectively.

    Government Affairs
    Tariff Tracker • Updated April 3, 2026

    MEMORANDUM

    The memo below outlines the current tariff rates faced by U.S. trade partners, as of March 16, 2026.

    Please note: It is not immediately clear how the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs may impact existing trade agreement frameworks. For this tracker’s purpose, we assume the reciprocal tariff rates agreed to through trade agreements are still in effect, even if the trade deal text cites nullified IEEPA Executive Orders as the statutory basis for the reciprocal rate.

    President Trump has utilized the following tariff authorities during his second term – an expanded description of each can be found at the conclusion of the document.

    • Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Utilized to address unfair trade practices;
    • Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Utilized to secure national defense;
    • International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Until the recent Supreme Court decision, it was utilized to address extraordinary threats to national security; and
    • Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974: Utilized to address large and serious balance-of-payments deficits.

    Global Section 122 Tariffs
    Temporary import surcharge (global) with product-specific exemptions

    Country Current Tariff Rate Additional Information Effective Date
    All (see product-specific exemptions) 10%
    Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge To Address Fundamental International Payments Problems

    Following the Supreme Court’s IEEPA decision, President Trump announced a global 10% tariff levied under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Effective February 24, 2026, the 10% rate remains in effect until July 24, 2026, unless Congress approves an extension.

    Exemptions listed in the Executive Order
    • All goods compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
    • All articles and parts of articles that currently are or later become subject to Section 232 actions
    • Textiles and apparel articles that enter duty-free as a good of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, or Nicaragua under the Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement
    • All goods set forth in Annexes I and II, which include certain critical minerals, energy products, agricultural products, pharmaceuticals and ingredients, and aerospace products:
      • Annex I
      • Annex II
    Currently in effect until July 24, 2026

    Sector Specific Tariffs
    Selected Section 232 actions and related measures

    Sector Current Tariff Rate Additional Information Effective Date Tariff Authority
    Chips and Semiconductors 25% on certain chips Imports of Semiconductors, Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment, and Their Derivative Products into the United States

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Takes Action on Certain Advanced Computing Chips to Protect America’s Economic and National Security

    On January 14, 2026, President Trump signed a proclamation directing the Secretary of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative to coordinate negotiations to reach international agreements addressing national security threats related to imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products. The proclamation also implements a 25% tariff on certain chips, including Nvidia H200 and AMD M1325X chips. The tariff will not apply to chips that are imported to support the domestic buildout of chip manufacturing. It further notes the President may issue broader tariffs in the near future.

    Currently in effect Section 232
    Steel, Aluminum, and Copper 50%

    25% for derivative products

    Reduced rates for U.K. imports

    10% for products made with American metals

    Strengthening Actions Taken to Adjust Imports of Aluminum, Steel, and Copper into the United States – The White House

    This EO outlines a new system for calculating duties on the metals that is based on the full value of the metals paid by U.S. customers. Further, it announces that articles made (or mostly made of) aluminum, steel, or copper will pay a 50% duty, with reduced rates for certain goods originating in the U.K. Derivative products of these metals will face a 25% duty, and products produced abroad using American metals will face a 10% duty. Finally, products composed of less than 15% steel, aluminum, or copper will no longer face Section 232 metal tariffs. A White House Fact Sheet on the EO is available here.

    Takes effect April 6, 2026 Section 232
    Kitchen Cabinets, Bathroom Vanities, and Associated Products 25% Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Adjusts Imports of Timber, Lumber, and Their Derivative Products into the United States

    On December 31, 2025, President Trump signed a proclamation maintaining the 25% rate on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities, as imposed under the September 25, 2025, Proclamation, will remain in effect until 2027. Under the original September Proclamation, a 50% rate was set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

    Currently in effect Section 232
    Medium- and Heavy-Duty Trucks 25% In a Truth Social post, President Trump announced that heavy trucks made outside the U.S. will face a 25% tariff.

    Truth Social link

    Currently in effect Section 232
    Medium- and Heavy-Duty Truck Parts 25% Adjusting Imports Of Medium- And Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Medium- And Heavy-Duty Vehicle Parts, And Buses Into The United States – The White House

    On October 17, 2025, President Trump announced an extension of the 25% tariff to truck parts, including key parts (engines, transmissions, tires, etc.). The 10/17 proclamation incentivized domestic medium- and heavy-duty truck production by offering an offset to a portion of tariffs for medium- and heavy-duty truck parts equal to 3.75% of the aggregate value of all trucks assembled in the United States from 2025 through 2030, reflecting the duty that would be owed when a 25% tariff is applied to 15% of the value of a U.S.-assembled medium- and heavy-duty truck.

    It also established a 10% tariff on imports of buses, including school and transit buses.

    Products subject to tariffs under this proclamation will not be subject to additional or existing sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminum, copper, automobiles and automobile parts, and lumber; they also will not be subject to reciprocal tariffs or the tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, Brazil, or India.

    Currently in effect Section 232
    Buses 10%
    Timber, Lumber, and Derivative Products
    10% on softwood lumber

    25% on certain upholstered furniture (increases to 30% on January 1, 2027)

    25% on kitchen cabinets and vanities (increases to 50% on January 1, 2027)
    President Trump signed a Proclamation imposing Section 232 tariffs on imports of timber, lumber, and their derivative products to support American industry and protect national security. The Section 232 tariff on subject wood imports from the United Kingdom will not exceed 10% and the combined Section 232 tariff and most-favored nation tariff on subject wood imports from the European Union and Japan will not exceed 15%.

    Adjusting Imports of Timber, Lumber, and their Derivative Products into the United States – The White House

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Addresses the Threat to National Security from Imports of Timber, Lumber, and Their Derivative Products – The White House

    The tariff increases were originally scheduled to come into effect on January 1, 2026; however, on December 31, 2025, President Trump issued a proclamation delaying the tariff increases a full year.

    Currently in effect Section 232
    Pharmaceuticals and associated ingredients 100% on certain patented pharmaceuticals and ingredients identified in Annex 1

    15% for EU, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein

    10% rate for companies entered into production onshoring agreements with the U.S.

    Adjusting Imports of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients into the United States

    This EO establishes a 100% tariff on patented pharmaceuticals and associated ingredients as identified in Annex I. The tariff will go into effect on July 31 for certain large pharmaceutical companies as identified by the Secretary of Commerce, and on September 29 for smaller companies identified by the Secretary. Further, products from the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein will face a 15% duty. Companies that enter into Most Favored Nation (MFN) pricing agreements with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and onshoring agreements with the Department of Commerce will face a 0% rate through January 20, 2029. However, companies that only enter into onshoring agreements (and not MFN agreements) will face a 20% rate. Generic pharmaceutical products and associated ingredients will not face tariffs. A White House Fact Sheet on the EO is linked here.

    July 31, 2026, for large pharmaceutical companies as identified by Commerce Secretary

    September 29, 2026, for smaller pharmaceutical companies as identified by Commerce Secretary

    Section 232

    Ongoing investigations launched under tariff authorities
    During President Trump’s second term

    Investigation(s) Additional Information Tariff Authority
    Forced Labor in Supply Chains USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigations Relating to Structural Excess Capacity and Production in Manufacturing Sectors | United States Trade Representative

    In March 2026, USTR announced the initiation of 60 new Section 301 investigations to determine whether the countries targeted by the probe have failed to address forced labor in their domestic supply chains. Notably, investigations into the U.K., China, Brazil, Canada, the European Union, India, Mexico, Japan, Vietnam, South Korea, and Indonesia are included in the list.

    Section 301
    Structural Excess Capacity and Production USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigations Relating to Structural Excess Capacity and Production in Manufacturing Sectors | United States Trade Representative

    In March 2026, USTR announced the initiation of Section 301 investigations into actions related to “structural excess capacity and production” in manufacturing sectors to determine if certain countries utilize policies and practices that are unreasonable or discriminatory. USTR identified the following countries as the focus of these investigations: China, the European Union, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan, and India.

    Section 301
    China’s Phase I Agreement Implementation Initiation of Section 301 Investigation: China’s Implementation of Commitments Under the Phase One Agreement; Notice of Hearing; and Request for Public Comments

    In October 2025, the Administration launched a Section 301 investigation into China’s implementation of the December 2019 Phase I trade agreement signed with the U.S.

    Section 301
    Brazil’s acts, policies, and practices (digital trade, payment services, preferential tariffs, anti-corruption enforcement, IP, ethanol access, illegal deforestation) Brazil’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Digital Trade and Electronic Payment Services; Unfair, Preferential Tariffs; Anti-Corruption Enforcement; Intellectual Property Protection; Ethanol Market Access; and Illegal Deforestation

    In July 2025, USTR announced a Section 301 investigation into Brazil’s practices related to digital trade, anti-corruption enforcement, intellectual property protection, and illegal deforestation.

    Section 301

    Top 5 Leading Goods Importers into the U.S. (through June 2025) *
    Tracker excerpt with notes on current tariff posture

    Country Current Tariff Rate Additional Information Effective Date Tariff Authority
    Mexico 10% Currently in effect Section 122
    Canada 10% Currently in effect Section 122
    China
    10%

    TBD (trade deal / investigations)
    U.S. and China announce Trade Deal (details TBD).

    USTR Suspension of Action in Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance | United States Trade Representative

    Suspension will last until November 10, 2026.

    Following the announcement of a trade deal with China, USTR announced the suspension of action in the Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance

    Initiation of Section 301 Investigation: China’s Implementation of Commitments Under the Phase One Agreement; Notice of Hearing; and Request for Public Comments (TBD).

    In October 2025, the Administration launched a Section 301 investigation into China’s implementation of the December 2019 Phase I trade agreement signed with the U.S.

    Section 122

    Trade deal

    Section 301

    Germany Please refer to the European Union in the table below
    Japan 15% Implementing The United States-Japan Agreement – The White House

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Implements A Historic U.S.-Japan Framework Agreement – The White House

    Currently in effect Trade Agreement
    * www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/topyr.html

    Status of de minimis duties
    Section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930

    Section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930 allows for the informal entry of articles that have a retail value of $800 or less – these de minimis shipments are usually duty and tax-free and subject to expedited clearance processing.

    Continuing the Suspension of Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries – The White House

    An executive order issued by Donald Trump eliminated this exemption for shipments from China and Hong Kong starting May 2, 2025, prompting a lawsuit (from industry) in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The case was paused to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to review the imposition of tariffs under IEEPA. Then, Congress passed and the President signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included a provision terminating the de minimis exception for commercial shipments from all countries as of July 1, 2027. President Trump then followed up with a second de minimis EO, moving that date up to Aug. 29, 2025.

    The Supreme Court did not directly address the validity of the suspension of de minimis treatment under IEEPA authority in its IEEPA ruling in February. Therefore, following the Supreme Court’s decision, President Trump signed an Executive Order clarifying that the de minimis suspension would continue even as other IEEPA measures were struck down.

    Following the Supreme Court decision, CIT agreed to allow the de minimis case to proceed on March 5, 2026. CIT has directed the federal government to file a response by March 26 and the plaintiff company by April 9 addressing several issues: how the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States may affect the China de minimis executive order, whether Congress’s specified deadline for ending the de minimis exemption influences the interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act as it relates to the executive orders in question, and how the orders’ special procedures for collecting duties should be carried out.

    Tariff rates agreed upon through trade deals or framework agreements
    Impacts of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA decision remain unclear

    Country Current Tariff Rate Additional Information Effective Date Type
    Argentina Varying, dependent on product Ambassador Greer Signs the United States–Argentina Agreement on Reciprocal Trade and Investment | United States Trade Representative

    Following the announcement of a trade deal framework with Argentina in November, the Administration signed a formal agreement on February 5, 2026, finalizing the agreement. Under the agreement, Argentina will eliminate tariffs on over 200 U.S. goods, including chemicals, pharmaceuticals, machinery, and many other products. The updated tariff schedule also indicates the removal of an additional 10% tariff on Argentine beef imports, however, Argentine beef will still face a 9% base tariff rate. The U.S. also agreed to remove reciprocal tariffs on 1,675 Argentine products, including “certain unavailable natural resources” and ingredients for pharmaceutical goods originating in Argentina. Further, Argentina will open its market to U.S. auto and auto parts that meet U.S. motor vehicle safety and emissions standards.

    Must be approved by Argentina’s National Congress Trade deal
    China
    10%

    TBD (trade deal / investigations)
    U.S. and China announce Trade Deal (details TBD).

    USTR Suspension of Action in Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance | United States Trade Representative

    Suspension will last until November 10, 2026.

    Following the announcement of a trade deal with China, USTR announced the suspension of action in the Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance

    Initiation of Section 301 Investigation: China’s Implementation of Commitments Under the Phase One Agreement; Notice of Hearing; and Request for Public Comments (TBD).

    In October 2025, the Administration launched a Section 301 investigation into China’s implementation of the December 2019 Phase I trade agreement signed with the U.S.

    Section 122

    Trade deal

    Section 301

    Taiwan 15% (with exemptions) Ambassador Greer Oversees Signing of U.S.-Taiwan Agreement on Reciprocal Trade | United States Trade Representative

    On January 15, 2026, the Administration announced that the U.S. and Taiwan have reached a trade deal that includes $250 billion in investment into the production of semiconductors, and an additional $250 billion in credit guarantees to support the semiconductor supply chain in the U.S. As part of the agreement, the U.S. will cap reciprocal tariff rates applied to Taiwanese goods at 15%. Further, generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients, aircraft components, and certain natural resources will not face a reciprocal tariff.

    TBD – Must be approved by Taiwan’s legislature Trade deal
    Bangladesh 19% Joint Statement on United States – Bangladesh Agreement on Reciprocal Trade – The White House

    On February 9, 2026, the White House released a joint statement with the government of Bangladesh announcing an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade. While a full, final agreement has not yet been disclosed by the White House, the joint statement explained that Bangladesh will provide significant preferential market access for U.S. industrial and agricultural goods. In response, the U.S. will reduce its reciprocal tariff rate on Bangladeshi goods from 20% to 19%. Further, the U.S. will commit to establishing a mechanism to allow for “certain textile and apparel goods from Bangladesh to receive a zero reciprocal tariff rate.”

    TBD Trade deal framework
    Cambodia 19% Agreement Between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Cambodia on Reciprocal Trade – The White House

    In October 2025, the U.S. and Cambodia announced a trade deal. Key terms include:

    • Cambodia commits to eliminating tariffs on 100 percent of U.S. industrial goods and U.S. food and agricultural products exported to Cambodia and has already implemented this commitment.
    • The United States commits to maintain at 19 percent the reciprocal tariffs, as set forth in Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, as amended, on originating goods of Cambodia, and identifies products from the list set out in Annex III to Executive Order 14346 of September 5, 2025, Potential Tariff Adjustments for Aligned Partners, to receive a zero percent reciprocal tariff rate.
    Currently in effect Trade deal
    Ecuador Varies by product – see tariff schedules in agreement Ambassador Greer Signs the United States-Ecuador Agreement on Reciprocal Trade | United States Trade Representative

    In March 2026, USTR announced the formal signing of an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade with Ecuador. The U.S. and Ecuador previously announced a joint statement on a framework deal in November 2025. Under the agreement, Ecuador pledged to reduce or eliminate tariffs on certain U.S. goods, including motor vehicles, certain agricultural items, chemicals, and health products. A full list of tariffed items and associated rates can be found in Schedule 1 of the Agreement. Further, Ecuador committed to working with the U.S. to facilitate investment in critical mineral projects. The U.S. will levy various tariff rates on Ecuadorian goods identified in Schedule 2 of the Agreement.

    Currently in effect Trade deal
    El Salvador TBD Joint Statement on Framework for United States-El Salvador Agreement on Reciprocal Trade – The White House

    El Salvador will streamline regulatory requirements for U.S. goods, including pharmaceuticals; remove import restrictions on remanufactured goods; and accept U.S. auto standards. El Salvador will also remove barriers to the entrance of U.S. agricultural goods to its market. The country will commit to advancing certain intellectual property treaties and preventing barriers to services and digital trade.

    TBD Trade deal framework
    European Union 15%

    50% on steel, aluminum and copper imports

    27.5% on automobiles

    Joint Statement on a United States-European Union Framework on an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade – The White House

    Fact Sheet: The United States and European Union Reach Massive Trade Deal – The White House

    EU-US trade deal explained – energy aspects (EU Commission)

    Exemptions include:

    European Commission President von der Leyen stated that “we have also agreed on zero-for-zero tariffs on a number of strategic products. This includes all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials.”

    TBD Trade deal framework
    Guatemala TBD Joint Guatemala will address certain non-tariff barriers, including by streamlining U.S. export approval requirements for pharmaceutical products and by removing restrictions on remanufactured goods. Further, Guatemala will accept U.S. auto standards, commit to addressing barriers to U.S. agricultural products, protect internationally recognized labor rights, and more effectively enforce its environmental laws. TBD Trade deal framework
    India 18% United States-India Joint Statement – The White House

    In a joint statement with India, President Trump announced a framework for an Interim Trade Agreement that would impose an 18% duty on Indian goods. India in term will reduce or eliminate tariffs on a variety of U.S. industry and agricultural products.

    TBD Trade deal framework
    Indonesia 19% Fact Sheet: The United States and Indonesia Reach Historic Trade Deal – The White House TBD Trade deal framework
    Japan 15% Implementing The United States-Japan Agreement – The White House

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Implements A Historic U.S.-Japan Framework Agreement – The White House

    Currently in effect Trade deal
    Liechtenstein 15% Fact Sheet: The United States, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein Reach a Historic Trade Deal

    In a trade deal framework released on November 14, 2025, the White House announced it will impose a maximum cumulative reciprocal tariff of 15% on Liechtenstein.

    Liechtenstein companies have announced investment into U.S. industries. Liechtenstein will also remove tariffs across agricultural and industrial sectors, including tariffs on fresh and dried nuts, fish and seafood, certain fruits, chemicals, and spirits such as whiskey and rum. The U.S., Liechtenstein, and Switzerland also committed to a framework of digital trade principles.

    TBD Trade deal framework
    Malaysia 19% Agreement Between the United States of America and Malaysia on Reciprocal Trade – The White House

    On 10/26, the White House announced a trade deal with Malaysia. Key terms of the deal include:

    • Malaysia has committed to provide significant preferential market access for U.S. industrial goods exports (including chemicals, machinery and electrical equipment, metals, passenger vehicles) and for U.S. agricultural exports (including dairy, horticultural products, poultry, processed products, beverages, pork, rice, and fuel ethanol).
    • The United States has committed to maintain at 19 percent the reciprocal tariffs first set forth in Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, as amended, on originating goods of Malaysia, and has identified products from the list set out in Annex III to Executive Order 14346 of September 5, 2025 to receive a zero percent reciprocal tariff rate. The U.S. and Malaysia also signed an MOU to strengthen cooperation on critical minerals supply chains and promote investment.

    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Malaysia Concerning Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments – The White House

    The U.S. and Malaysia also signed a Memorandum of Understanding to strengthen cooperation between the countries on critical minerals supply chains development and expansion and to promote trade and investment between the countries in critical mineral resource exploration, extraction, processing and refining, manufacturing, and recycling and recovery.

    Currently in effect Trade deal
    South Korea 15% Fact Sheet: The United States and Korea Agree to the Korea Strategic Trade and Investment Deal

    South Korea’s National Assembly ratified the deal in March 2026, authorizing the establishment of a state-run investment corporation designed to manage South Korea’s $350 billion in planned investment into the U.S. as part of the deal.

    Currently in effect Trade deal
    Switzerland 15% (maximum) Fact Sheet: The United States, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein Reach a Historic Trade Deal – The White House

    In a trade deal framework released on November 14, 2025, the White House announced it would impose a maximum cumulative reciprocal tariff of 15% on Switzerland. Switzerland has committed to balancing its trade with the U.S. and several Swiss companies have announced investment in U.S. industries. Switzerland will also remove tariffs across agricultural and industrial sectors and establish tariff rate quotas for American poultry, beef, and bison. The U.S., Liechtenstein, and Switzerland also committed to a framework of digital trade principles.

    Switzerland has committed to balancing its trade with the U.S., and several Swiss companies have announced investment in U.S. industries. Switzerland will also remove tariffs across agricultural and industrial sectors, including tariffs on fresh and dried nuts, fish and seafood, certain fruits, chemicals, and spirits such as whiskey and rum. In addition, Switzerland will establish tariff rate quotas for American poultry, beef, and bison.

    The U.S., Liechtenstein, and Switzerland also committed to a framework of digital trade principles.

    TBD Trade deal framework
    Thailand 19% Joint Statement on a Framework for a United States-Thailand Agreement on Reciprocal Trade – The White House

    On 10/26, the White House announced a trade deal with Thailand. Key details include:

    • Thailand will eliminate tariff barriers on approximately 99 percent of goods, covering a full range of U.S. industrial and food and agricultural products.
    • The United States will maintain at 19 percent the reciprocal tariffs (as set forth in Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, as amended) on originating goods of Thailand, and will identify products from the list set out in Annex III to Executive Order 14346 of September 5, 2025 to receive a zero percent reciprocal tariff rate.

    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand Concerning Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments – The White House

    The U.S. and Thailand also signed a Memorandum of Understanding seeking to cooperate in strengthening critical minerals resource sector governance, promoting partnerships between U.S. and Thai companies, and promoting trade and investment between the Participants to expand Thailand’s integration into secure and reliable global supply chains.

    Currently in effect Trade deal
    United Kingdom
    10%

    10% on U.K. automotive imports (quota)
    Implementing the General Terms of the United States of America – United Kingdom Economic Prosperity Deal

    As part of the deal, the United States intends to create an annual quota of 100,000 vehicles for United Kingdom automotive imports at a 10 percent tariff rate.

    Technology Prosperity Deal:

    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the U.S. and the Government of the U.K. regarding the Technology Prosperity Deal – The White House.

    The Technology Prosperity Deal is a collaborative effort between the U.K. and U.S. to advance technology disciplines, including artificial intelligence (AI), civil nuclear, fusion, and quantum technologies. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes a joint flagship research program between U.S. and U.K. science agencies to advance the development of models and datasets in shared priority areas, including AI for biotechnology and medicine. Additionally, the MOU calls for increased coordination on non-proliferation and nuclear security programs to maximize certainty for both U.S. and U.K. markets. Furthermore, the memorandum establishes a U.S.–UK task force to accelerate breakthroughs in benchmarking across quantum computing hardware, software, and algorithms. According to the MOU, the U.S. and U.K. intend to establish and convene a “Ministerial-Level Working Group” within six months.

    Currently in effect
    Please see MOU for varying timelines
    Section 122
    Trade deal
    Technology Prosperity Deal (MOU)
    Vietnam 20% Joint Statement on United States-Vietnam Framework for an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade – The White House TBD Trade deal framework

    Other Notable Tariffs

    Sector/Country Current Tariff Rate Additional Information Effective Date Tariff Authority
    Brazil
    10%
    TBD (investigation)
    USTR Announces Initiation of Section 301 Investigation of Brazil’s Unfair Trading Practices (TBD).

    In July 2025, the U.S. launched a Section 301 investigation to determine whether acts, policies, and practices of the Government of Brazil related to digital trade and electronic payment services; unfair, preferential tariffs; anti-corruption interference; intellectual property protection; ethanol market access; and illegal deforestation are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce.

    Currently in effect
    Section 122
    Section 301

    Tariff Authorities Used under President Trump’s Second Term

    Synopsis: President Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone feature of his economic strategy. The Administration has leveraged Section 301 to address unfair trade practices; Section 232 to secure national defense; the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (until the recent Supreme Court decision) to address extraordinary threats to national security; and, most recently, Section 122 to address large and serious balance-of-payments deficits.

    International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA): 50 U.S. Code Chapter 35

    • IEEPA tariffs no longer in effect following Supreme Court decision.

    Summary: IEEPA provides the President with broad authority to regulate economic transactions following the declaration of a national emergency in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security or the economy. Unlike other trade authorities, the President is not required to initiate formal investigatory proceedings before initiating an IEEPA action.

    Manufacturing Impacts: Given the flexibility and immediate authorities provided by the law, President Trump’s use of the law created vast uncertainty across the industry as tariff rates were continually altered due to trade negotiations and geopolitical developments. Under IEEPA, U.S. trade partners faced anywhere between 10% and 50% reciprocal tariffs, often stacked onto existing tariffs levied under other authorities. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said IEEPA tariff revenue accounted for over 60% of total tariff revenue as of December 2025. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the President’s authority to impose tariffs via IEEPA, U.S. manufacturers await the next steps on potential refunds of the estimated $130–200 billion in duties collected.

    Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: 19 U.S. Code § 1862

    Summary: Section 232 allows the President to levy and/or adjust import duties in cases where the Department of Commerce has determined that the product at issue “is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security.” Under the authority, the President must initiate an investigation (which can be requested by any head of a federal agency or interested party from industry), led by the Department of Commerce, to examine domestic production needs for defense capabilities, foreign competition impacts on critical industries, and the domestic strength of the workforce and supply chains. Commerce will solicit public comments and hold hearings during this process. Within 270 days of investigation initiation, Commerce must report to the President on whether the imports impair national security and include recommendations on next steps for action. The President then has 90 days to concur formally with the report, after which the tariffs may be levied.

    Manufacturing Impacts: During his second term, President Trump has utilized Section 232 tariffs on a variety of products and industries, with particular focus on imports of steel and aluminum and their derivative products. Section 232 duties have also been levied on automobiles and parts, lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and copper. The Tax Foundation estimates that of the ~$265 billion in customs duties raised in 2025, around $36 billion was collected through Section 232 duties.

    Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: 19 U.S. Code § 2411

    Summary: Section 301 allows the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to initiate an investigation into unreasonable or discriminatory trade practices in response to a petition filed by an interested party or USTR’s own initiative. Under Section 301, USTR must publish a notice describing the practices under investigation, as well as deadlines for public comments. USTR will also hold hearings to receive further public feedback and will often engage with representatives of the country in question. Following the initiation of the investigation, USTR has 12 months to reach a determination, and 18 months should the case involve a trade agreement dispute requiring a formal settlement. Should USTR affirmatively determine that a country has engaged in unreasonable or discriminatory practices, it must determine the “appropriate and feasible action” to address them.

    Manufacturing Impacts: The Trump administration has largely focused its Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports, a continuation of trade policy utilized during President Trump’s first term. For example, the Administration has pursued 301 investigations into China’s trade practices regarding semiconductors and digital trade. No estimates are available on the total revenue collected under Section 301.

    Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974: 19 U.S. Code § 213

    Summary: Prior to President Trump’s announcement of Section 122 tariffs following the Supreme Court’s IEEPA decision, no president had ever invoked the authority to levy duties. Under this authority, the President is authorized to implement tariffs of up to 15% to address serious balance-of-payment deficits, or to prevent the depreciation of the dollar for 150 days, unless Congress votes to extend the tariffs. Section 122 tariffs may be enacted immediately, without notice-and-comment and investigative steps that are often required under other tariff authorities.

    Manufacturing Impacts: Beginning on February 24, 2026, President Trump announced a 10% global tariff on most imports. Should Congress not extend the tariff, it will expire on July 24, 2026. The Administration included exemptions for some imports, including certain critical minerals, energy products, pharmaceuticals, and goods already subject to Section 232 tariffs.

    Trade & Tariffs

    Executive Order: ADDRESSING THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION | August 6, 2025
    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Addresses Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation | August 6, 2025
    Reciprocal Tariffs – Annex II | August 1, 2025
    Executive Order: FURTUR MODIFYING THE RECIPROCAL TARIFF RATES | August 1, 2025
    Fact Sheet: The United States and European Union Reach Massive Trade Deal | July 28, 2025
    Face Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Secures Unprecedented U.S.–Japan Strategic Trade and Investment Agreement | July 23, 2025
    Joint Statement on Framework for United States – Indonesia Agreement on Reciprocal Trade | July 22, 2025
    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Continues Enforcement of Reciprocal Tariffs and Announces New Tariff Rates | July 07, 2025
    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Secures a Historic Trade Win for the United States | May 12, 2025
    Joint Statement on U.S. – China Economic and Trade Meeting in Geneva | May 12, 2025
    SOCMA Joint Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Semiconductors and Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment | May 07, 2025
    SOCMA Joint Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients | May 07, 2025
    Executive Order on Cumulative Tariffs | April 29, 2025
    Notice of Request – Section 232 – Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaceutical Ingredients 
    Notice of Request – Section 232 – Semiconductors and Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment
    From Miller Chevalier – What You Need to Know About Reciprocal Tariffs
    Guidance – Reciprocal Tariffs | April 05, 2025
    SOCMA Statement on Reciprocal Tariffs and U.S. Manufacturing Strategy | April 03, 2025
    SOCMA Urges Trade Policies that Balance Domestic Protection with Access to Critical Materials | February 02, 2025

    Regulatory & Environmental Policy

    Comments on EPA’s Proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants | April 14, 2025
    EPA Extension of CMAS Rulemaking Comment Period to April 14
    EPA Deregulatory Actions | March 13, 2025
    Letter to Zeldin on Staffing | March 05, 2025
    IRIS Letter | January 27, 2025
    SOCMA Commends Congressional Focus on Revitalizing TSCA and Advancing U.S. Chemical Innovation | January 22, 2025

    Supply Chain Disruptions

    SOCMA Statement on President Trump’s Address to a Joint Session on Congress | March 05, 2025
    SOCMA Statement on New Tariffs for Mexico, Canada, and China | November 26, 2024

    SOCMA Advocacy & Action

    SOCMA in Washington: Specialty Chemical Leaders Push for Growth, Innovation & Reshoring | May 23, 2025
    Specialty Chemical Manufacturers: America’s Ready-to-Go Production Engine
    Letter to President Trump – SOCMA Meeting Request | April 30, 2025
    Specialty Chemical Manufacturers: America’s Ready-to-Go Production Engine | April 30, 2025
    SOCMA Statement on Reciprocal Tariffs and U.S. Manufacturing Strategy | April 03, 2025
    EPA Deregulatory Actions | March 13, 2025
    Letter to Zeldin on Staffing | March 05, 2025
    SOCMA Statement on President Trump’s Address to a Joint Session on Congress | March 05, 2025
    SOCMA Urges Trade Policies that Balance Domestic Protection with Access to Critical Materials | February 02, 2025
    IRIS Letter | January 27, 2025
    SOCMA Commends Congressional Focus on Revitalizing TSCA and Advancing U.S. Chemical Innovation | January 22, 2025
    Open Letter to Incoming Trump Administration | January 20, 2025

    Member Resources & Insights

    Sign Up for SOCMA’s Friday Roundup Policy Briefings
    2024 Year in Review

    Participate!

    SOCMA needs input from members on all policy-related matters. The best way to receive updates and ensure your teams stay informed on critical regulatory/legislative issues directly impacting your facility is through participation in Government Relations-based SOCMA committees. Participation levels vary from company to company and individual to individual. Some members simply receive email updates on new laws and regulations, others work directly with the GR team to develop SOCMA regulatory/legislative direction and activity, while others participate by delivering testimony, comments, and other opportunities to educate key policymakers.

    Contact jklein@socma.org to learn more!

    Contact SOCMA

    Jenn Klein
    President & CEO
    jklein@socma.org

    RECENT NEWS

    SOCMA Issues Comments on OSTP Request for Information on New National Strategy

    Read more

    SOCMA Statement on Project Vault

    Read more

    SOCMA Welcomes the U.S. Senate’s Confirmation of Douglas M. Troutman as Assistant Administrator for the EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP).

    Read more

    Go back
    • About
    • Commercial
    • Policy
    • Operations / Manufacturing
    • Membership
    • News and Resources
    • Events
      • SOCMA Show
    • Affiliated Organizations
    • Careers at SOCMA

    Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates | 1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 630, Arlington, VA 22202

    Contact Us | (571) 348-5100 | Fax: (571) 348-5138 |

    © 2026 Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use